![]() ![]() I can download another trial version or/and another manual, but am fully sure that you already know the answer. What it can not do - but Studio Pro can? Am I missing something? Talking about raw: Photo Editor 11 can open a raw file (say. I have never known it to be particularly slow, but I have been using Windows 10 since before this editor was released. I really like staying within the same user interface and color management environment whenever possible. I use the ACDSee Editor module about as much as I do Affinity. ![]() I have both the ACDSee Ultimate program and Affinity Photo. ![]() Is it as complete as Photoshop? NOPE! Not even close! But it is a very good and reliable editor that will do almost as much at a fraction of the cost. It does adjustment layers, and supports most standard *.8bf photoshop plugins. I would be surprised if the latest standalone was any different. Aside from the ability to function as a standalone, it was identical to that of the "Ultimate" Editor module of its generation. I don't own the current version of the standalone Editor, but I do have the previous version. In fact, it IS the same module as Photo Editor 11, only enough additional infrastructure was added, to allow it to function as a stand-alone editor program without the DAM or the Raw development. The bitmapped editor in "Pro" is the standard 'touch-up' editor that ACDSee has used for 15 years at least (with a few improvements over the years, but still a basic touch-up editor.) The editor module in "Ultimate" is virtually identical to Photo Editor 11. ACDSee's raw development is only available through ACDSee Photo Studio Professional and ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate. The stand-alone photo editor does not have a raw development feature. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |